12.24.2010

12.22.2010

Kabalevsky Sonata Op. 46

So I promised to write about this sonata. I spent some time yesterday working on it, and fall more in love with it all the time. It's the perfect antidote for too much Mozart.

The sonata was composed in 1945, right towards the end of World War II. The Soviet Union emerged from the war as one of the world's superpowers, but the victory came at a steep price. The estimated death toll was roughly 27 million. I can imagine that, despite the victory, the USSR was not a particularly bright and happy place in 1945.

According to Kabalevsky, this is not a strictly programmatic work. However, the two themes of youth and war are prevalent throughout the sonata. The themes clash through the piece, and youth is victorious in the end. And if you know Kabalevsky and his penchant for the inspiration of children, that makes perfect sense. It made really wonderful propaganda for the Communists at this time, but it also, in an under-handed way, made known Kabalevsky's opinion of the war. This is a good example of what I mentioned in the post about Kabalevsky. He was able to write truly good music under the Communist regime. He did what he needed to do to be able to write his music. Anything is possible if you are talented and clever enough to make it so.

The entire sonata is energetic and spirited. Both youth and war are energetic and spirited; they are so in completely opposite ways. The first movement opens with a theme of youth. It's bright and quick and mischievous in an innocent sort of way. It skips along. The second theme is also one of youth, perhaps less carefree but still fun and light. The rhythms here are particularly fun to play (and by fun, I mean difficult but impressive). In the development of the first movement, the war theme appears. All these really crazy rhythms come flying out of nowhere, but it's really exciting. There's a lot of big bass stuff in here as well, symbolizing the war theme. Youth and war struggle for a bit, then the war theme subsides completely and almost instantaneously. There's a sense of nervousness and agitation through the rest of the movement.

The second movement is very similar. It opens with a sweet, graceful youth theme. The war theme comes back, but it's sneakier this time around. (I prefer this) These dissonances start creeping in. Every time you hear one, it's a little bit less subtle. I'm just so inspired by the way Kabalevsky does this. It really is masterful. As in the first movement, the youth theme comes back in the end, much more raucous than we've heard it before.

The third movement portrays the triumph of youth. It's a fast waltz (*FAST* waltz) and it's witty and roguish. I think it depicts very well that overwhelming exuberance of youth.



12.21.2010

Kabalevsky

My semester from hell has ended! I'm enjoying some much needed relaxation (with my handsome new fiancé! *girlish squeal*), and figure that I could do something at least semi-productive with all this free time.

As much as I love Mozart, I'm very happy to be free of him for a good while. My jury went well and I am officially a performance major now! Hooray! This means that I get to start planning super-fun things like a junior recital!

I have this odd fascination with 20th century Russian composers. The Soviets really could compose music like none I've heard (and I mean that in the best possible way). There are 20th century elements involved, those being dissonance, strange rhythmic patterns and meter changes, etc. But they somehow manage to simultaneously create beautiful melodies. I suppose I like it because it's interesting in all the ways that only 20th century music can be interesting, while still be an enjoyable listening experience. I am particularly in love with Shostakovich's second piano sonata but, unfortunately, the technical difficulties are too much for me to handle right now. My professor was kind enough to assign me a Kabalevsky sonata instead so I can get my Soviet fix.

Kabalevsky was an interesting guy. His father was a mathematician, but he was drawn to the arts and became a composer. He studied at the Moscow Conservatory and became a professor there in 1932. At this time he joined the newly formed Union of Soviet Composers, which promoted the idea of Socialist Realism in the arts. Generally speaking, they promoted Communism, though their doctrinal goal was a "truthful and historically concrete depiction of reality in its revolutionary development." He joined the Communist party in 1940 and began writing lots and lots of fun-time patriotic Communist music, including pieces with names such as The Heroes of the Revolution of 1905, Vast Motherland, and Revenger of the People. Oh, yes. In the 1940s he was briefly accused of formalism. That is, he was supposedly composing music for music's sake and not for the glorification of the Communist party. But he knew some people who knew some people and the charges were quickly dropped. I do admire his ability to write creative music under such a strict regime. It's something that many composers struggled with.

My favorite thing about Kabalevsky (besides his being a hard-core Commie, obviously) is his desire to bring good music to children. In fact, before a few weeks ago, I had no idea that he wrote anything but really wonderful early- and intermediate-level literature for children. During his lifetime he set up strong music education programs in some twenty-five Soviet schools. He also wrote several large-scale works involving children's choruses.

In terms of his actual music, it was much less adventurous than that of his contemporaries. The harmonies are interesting, but diatonic for the most part. He liked to play with chromaticism and the interchange of major and minor.

I want to write about the sonata I'm playing, but I'll most likely be long-winded about that as well. I'll leave it for next time.


12.10.2010

Nurturing Creativity

I found this to be...wonderful, actually.

Read here.